What's up, RMers? - Printable Version +- Save-Point (https://www.save-point.org) +-- Forum: Games Development (https://www.save-point.org/forum-4.html) +--- Forum: Development Discussion (https://www.save-point.org/forum-17.html) +--- Thread: What's up, RMers? (/thread-395.html) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
|
RE: What's up, RMers? - MechanicalPen - 11-14-2014 Well, whatever comes out of guns in Wolf3D then. It's really just 'line-of-sight with damage' which would be easy if I were still using tile shaped walls. But FPLE2 walls can be any shape, so it's trickier... RE: What's up, RMers? - Taylor - 11-21-2014 Thinking of dumping my current "store" system. It's currently based on a forge script I've heavily edited. My concern, as I've already maybe pointed out (I don't remember what I've talked about), is that since I have to hand-specify forge recipes, that it's liable to be unbalanced. EDIT: In the end, I decided to dump the trade/barter system and opt for the usual currency-using shops. Of course, there are some unique extras and it uses a custom screen, but it's a lot more straight-forward than what I was originally thinking of. Really the only advantage to a trade system was trying to give the world some "flare", when mechanically it wouldn't really be that helpful to the player. RE: What's up, RMers? - Ahzoh - 12-12-2014 I had an idea for "elements": there would only be three elements. Those would be : physical, magical, and environmental Physical would consist of... well physical things like sword strikes and arrow shots. Magical would consist of spells. Environmental would consist of things like if you are out in a blizzard and you are naked, you will suffer cold damage, if you are out in the desert without water, you will suffer heat damage, and if you are in a toxic environment, you will suffer poison damage. RE: What's up, RMers? - Steel Beast 6Beets - 12-12-2014 (12-12-2014, 07:25 AM)Ahzoh Wrote: Environmental would consist of things like if you are out in a blizzard and you are naked, you will suffer cold damage, if you are out in the desert without water, you will suffer heat damage, and if you are in a toxic environment, you will suffer poison damage.It would be interesting to see environmental hazards playing an important role in a game's mechanics rather than just being part a dungeon's gimmick like most game seems to use them. Unrelated to the above, I've got a question about the Method and Class Library: Do I risk to run into compatibility issues with other scripts by including it or is that only a Standard Development Kit thing? RE: What's up, RMers? - DerVVulfman - 12-13-2014 Oh, Compatability issues is mainly with the SDK system. as it rewrites many methods. The MACL instead 'adds new' methods.... mostly. And you can pick n choose different MACL sections if you like. Funny enough, some old 2005-2007 scripts made their way 'into' the MACL. RE: What's up, RMers? - Steel Beast 6Beets - 12-13-2014 Guess so. Thinking about it, though, scripts always warn about compatibility issues with SDK and only mention MACL if it is required. That should've tipped me off. RE: What's up, RMers? - DerVVulfman - 12-14-2014 (12-13-2014, 01:29 PM)Steel Beast 6Beets Wrote: Guess so. Thinking about it, though, scripts always warn about compatibility issues with SDK and only mention MACL if it is required. That should've tipped me off.The SDK is kinda one of the models we have for ReGaL's default scripts. The SDK system was a plug-in script that rewrote the default scripts with smaller method segments.... like it would look at one method (like def update) and cut it up into smaller methods (def update, def update_variables, def update_mainloop, def update_traspose). The problem with some scripts is that you'd need to rewrite a whole method to add something 'inside' one of these large methods. If they were in a more modular fashion, one would only need to alias (or attach) code to just one smaller bit of code. Of course, that's ONE part. RE: What's up, RMers? - kyonides - 12-15-2014 Well, I've been crafting my KBattle XP script for a couple of weeks now. I think my last upload should be consider the first beta version available online but there are several important details that might not be working as expected. It's very simple compare to what I dreamed up. Even so I hope it will end up being a decent front-sideview custom battle system. RE: What's up, RMers? - Taylor - 12-22-2014 Ace, when I generate parameters using "fast", why do you sometimes make stats go down? (As indicated by the little dips.) Stat growth is annoying me at the moment also because sometimes a character levels up and gains no new stats, visible in the battle-end level up screen. It looks bad because, beyond HP/SP, it would give the player this impression of "oh you wanted to be stronger? please fight some more". What I'd like is to have characters always gain increase 2-3 of their parameters, but I don't think I can easily formulate that, and have the min-maxes I want (to match character types/personalities), and... whatever else. This project is still early stages, why am I being so finicky about parameters now? *thud* RE: What's up, RMers? - MechanicalPen - 12-22-2014 There IS a way you can make sure a stat always grows without harming the overall growth formula. You'd just need to store fractional stats (like, millistats), and if no stat would rise, increase the stat that is closest to an increase by one but also subtract that stat's fractional part by, say, 100 so it won't rise again until it's accrued enough growth. I may not have explained this very well; but it's basically a Bresenham Line Algorithm |