After Remi-chan's post disfavorably mentioning someone within the RPGMaker community, one whom garnered adverse attention in our forum based upon content and links she provided, I received complaints within our PM system. The complaints stated that she was involved in "deep injustice without knowing it," suggesting the "she's brainwashed/fed lies about" the apparent 'victim', and posted harmful content elsewhere.

Yes, I did quote from the PMs, and refer to the other individual as the 'victim' or apparent 'victim' throughout this post.

The apparent 'victim' was known for being helpful with tutorials and gave assistance in the RPGMaker community. That much I can confirm. However, while I asked for proof and content of claims made against Remi-chan in response to the complaints, I have not received anything since this past Tuesday (March 30th). This silence may have been a result of my candidness as I replied how I contacted others also privy to the incidents mentioned by Remi-chan. That some were those I've known a number of them in the old RMXP.Org days, and confirmed her stance appeared to infuriate them.

I cannot just take a complaint, and pass any judgement without hearing from others. To take an argument based upon just one side's story is not just. But when that one side cannot offer any proof or examples of infractions, I have a problem.

As I had received no further push-back against Remi-chan and some disturbing content about the apparent 'victim', I continued checking the veracity of complaints against the 'victim'. Screenshots provided by an administrator within another forum and the assumed 'victim's snubbing off comments were one thing. That the screenshots included the assumed victim's statement agreeing with his religion condoned a given group be 'punishable by death', was another.

Despite citing it being part of his religious doctrine, said dialogue would never be tolerated within our forum as it would clearly violate our rules on hate speech. Note that I will not tolerate this as an excuse to attack religion either.

The apparent 'victim' has been under this shadow for some time and could have faded away. But it was his own actions that returned attention back to him. Just over a week ago, he created a so-called game where he (in a self-insert) walked through out a train to confront his critics (masked in white-noise TV static) before actually killing them. There is a review of the game that was less than flattering, even suggesting the assumed victim was disturbed.

I watched a play-through of the game, posted on Youtube and supplied by the apparent 'victim' himself. It was the biggest 45-minute waste of my life, confirming what the game critic who reviewed it had stated.

In essence, the apparent victim, basically shot himself in the foot and gave his critics more fodder.