What's on your mind? - Printable Version +- Save-Point (https://www.save-point.org) +-- Forum: Official Area (https://www.save-point.org/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: General Chat (https://www.save-point.org/forum-13.html) +--- Thread: What's on your mind? (/thread-2182.html) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
|
RE: What's on your mind? - Bounty Hunter Lani - 07-21-2016 Apparently, AMC has been after a certain spoiler site for The Walking Dead for a while, because the site was misquoted as saying they knew who a character had killed at the end of last season. Now, the site has apparently snuck in a spoiler in one of their posts, and it's spread across the internet, and the spoiler site denies it, because the post they used to "Spoil" the person who was killed had jokes mixed in, and therefore, they say the whole post was a joke, but AMC unknowingly CONFIRMED who died. Basically, AMC channel were so busy trying to defend their property from spoilers, that they ended up giving the spoiler on their own. They played themselves. Silly people RE: What's on your mind? - Bounty Hunter Lani - 07-23-2016 Gonna get into politics here for a second, I won't bother with justifying any of this. I've got tons to do already. Wikileaks leaked a ton of emails from the DNC earlier, many of them proving how Anti-Bernie the DNC really was, and how nasty their tactics were going to get. Debbie Wasserman Schultz was claiming on MSNBC that neither she nor the DNC were Anti-Bernie at all, and welcomes him to the party. What do her own emails say, though? The opposite. And that's why the Pro-Bernie Wikileaks released the emails. They were going to use Bernie's Jewish heritage as a striking point against him if he didn't leave the race, planning to "Out" him as an atheist by having a reporter under their payroll (many are outed in different emails, there are quite a few on MSNBC) ask Bernie about his religion, and call him out for not being true to it. In another email, they were suggesting they having pictures falsified to show Bernie eating foods a Jew wouldn't eat, etc. Some more of their gameplan to take down Bernie: These are all emails directly from the DNC, many from Debbie Wasserman Schultz herself, proving an Anti-Bernie bias, despite claiming otherwise in public. I wonder what Bernie has to say about this? Last I saw, his Twitter was making random tweets that may have been coming from a staffer. Also, the DNC's convention plans were leaked, and lots of it involves blatant deception and juvenile antics. They're gonna find a broken-down bridge and blame the Republicans, but in the email, it also says to ignore anyone mentioning of their funding cuts for the bridges in the area. Basically, don't admit they cut the funding, and blame Republicans anyway. They're also gonna hand out "Barf bags" from watching Trump speak, and "Care packages" full of Tylenol, Advil, Vitamin C, etc. to cure the headaches. Real mature... (Pretty funny, though. It's my kind of humor ) One final note... The leaked emails proved that "The big banks" who Bernie hates, are sending emails directly to Hillary and to the DNC, planting dishonest newspaper headlines by funding reporters who await DNC orders for stories and talking points. As said by Wikileaks on Twitter: Broadcasters so far implicanted in #DNCLeaks: MSNBC, CBS Broadcasters so far not covering #DNCLeaks: MSNBC, CBS Figures. *IF YOU WANT TO TAKE ISSUE WITH ANYTHING, TAKE IT UP WITH WIKILEAKS, NOT ME. THEY LEAKED THE EMAILS, NOT ME. I'M JUST REPORTING WHAT I SAW. RE: What's on your mind? - Bounty Hunter Lani - 07-23-2016 Jake Tapper, one of the people implicated in the #DNCLeaks by Wikileaks, is going to be "Covering the leaks" tomorrow. Uhhhhhh.... He's one of the people bought out by the DNC, fed pre-screened questions to ask. Clinton News Network indeed. Jake Tapper says all of the emails are real, but he's trying to defend himself by saying he didn't write anything, his staffers did. Yup. Totally the staffer. All the staffer's fault! UPDATE: CNN says they "Cannot confirm" if the Wikileaks emails are real or not. I wonder if it has anything to do with the fact a CNN PRODUCER and WRITER was implicated as well? These leaks could be posted for DAYS, but CNN is already doomed at this point. Impossible to trust them when their producers, writers, and anchors are all being fed directly from DNC on what to do and say. And now that they're pretty much playing dumb on the leak, I'm pretty sure they know they're doomed as well. FINAL UPDATE: When there aren't many protesters at a protest, the DNC sends in their interns to make it look like a big protest full of people. Welcome to America, everyone. Hope you enjoy your deception served with a side of "YOU'RE RACIST!" RE: What's on your mind? - Ahzoh - 07-24-2016 As a "libtard", I don't find this surprising. Politics. Really, our choices this year are between a lying member of the status quo and a fascist by definition. RE: What's on your mind? - Bounty Hunter Lani - 07-24-2016 Working on getting some more things for my game, photoshopping my buns off... Working on getting a Twitter for my Youtube channel... Working on a "Watch More" thing for the end of my Youtube videos... Working on sourcing images... Today was a good day. RE: What's on your mind? - DerVVulfman - 07-24-2016 Choices this year... A libtard facist lying piece of work, or someone running on the Republican ticket pointing out what's wrong with the Libtards. Of course, Libtards don't call out their own. Hm... yeah yeah yeah. Seig Heil, Hillary. RE: What's on your mind? - Ahzoh - 07-24-2016 (07-24-2016, 03:50 AM)DerVVulfman Wrote: Hm... yeah yeah yeah. Seig Heil, Hillary.I think you mispelled "Trump". Hillary isn't nationalist, traditionalist, or militaristic enough to be a fascist. She also isn't populist, though she tries. No, the fascist here is Trump, I'm sure of it. Hillary is just your typical politician. Also, not every straight arm raise at an angle is a nazi salute, otherwise Laura Ingram also did it at the RNC, for like 3 seconds. This is a definition of Fascism I adhere to: http://interglacial.com/pub/text/Umberto_Eco_-_Eternal_Fascism.html But of course you have your right wing bias and I have my left wing bias (though it doesn't blind me to my own side's flaws like yours does). RE: What's on your mind? - DerVVulfman - 07-24-2016 (07-24-2016, 05:11 AM)Ahzoh Wrote: I think you mispelled "Trump". Ah, I misspelled the name 'Hilarity', because she is instead a joke. And I do not appreciate the way you already issued an attack with the phrase (though it doesn't blind me to my own side's flaws like yours does). That's one. Do not let there be a second. You do have a tendency to actively make things personal. Ah, Umberto Eno, the author of The Name of the Rose. I still have my old paperback of the novel somewhere on my bookshelf. Hehe.. I now have it in my HANDS. The tale of William de Baskerville, a Franciscan monk in 1327 who became detective after seven grissly deaths. Now insofar as his points on Facism from his 1995 discussion, most (if not all) can be attributed to the Liberal party as shown below: Content Hidden So your definition of fascism can easily be used to identify the liberal party just the same, if not moreso. And do not again direct insults at anyone in your post, either directly or indirectly. RE: What's on your mind? - KDC - 07-24-2016 (Hmmm... Bring shorts or not bring shorts to this vacation coming in a week, planned by my mother. That's what's mostly on my mind today)... Uh... Erm...(Scratch that. Kittens and Puppy watching for now.) (Hooray Monologues....?) RE: What's on your mind? - Ahzoh - 07-24-2016 @DerVV: I find those associations tentative at best. |