06-14-2016, 04:26 AM
You're probably misinterpreting what I wrote or the way I wrote it. He will be protected in prison by always being in a high security solitary confinement. No interaction with other prisoners, only guards. If he was to be placed in general population, he wouldn't last very long, he's too high profile to not get a shank to the kidneys.
This dude was under two FBI investigations and Clinton's state department blocked them. This incompetent witch wants to increase dragnet surveillance and increase "gun control". What about the other 37,000+ gun laws we've already got passed? What about the millions of guns that have already been purchased year over year that are still out there on the streets? Are those going to magically disappear? Guns are here, criminals don't worry their precious little heads over "common sense gun control", "universal background checks" or your "gun free zone" nonsense.
One of the biggest problems I think these alphabet agencies have, namely NSA at the very least, is warrant-less dragnet surveillance. Having data is great, but these folks are probably absolutely drowning in useless and trivial information, so much so that no algorithm can save them from the ever-growing cluster fuck they must manually sift through. How are you going to flag that data? 13 keywords? How many people use any one of those 13 keywords daily just talking about world events? I'm sure everybody is flagged at one point or another, possibly on a daily basis.
Imagine you're able to collect 90% of the world's E-Mail contents, 90% of the world's text messages and voice audio from phone calls. How much are you and your team going to be able to listen to on a daily basis? I'd figure such an agency would need to employ 10% of the U.S. population just to spy on the other 90% of the citizens, if everybody was assigned the same ten people daily, giving them an hour for each person each day. So if you have an estimated population of 320,000,000, you would need to employ 32,000,000 people to keep track of the other 288,000,000 people.
^That's only based on blindly assuming the NSA "we're spying on everything" myth is true. It wouldn't surprise me if it was, they're so bad at stopping terrorism. Either that or there is no NSA spy network, whatsoever.
Anyways...
It was only a few days ago that I mentioned how much these guys hate homosexuals. I had a feeling this sort of thing was going to happen any day now, I'm not even surprised they shot up a gay club. I already have a feeling I know where they'll hit next but... no, I shouldn't make predictions, it's bad luck and bad juju.
This dude was under two FBI investigations and Clinton's state department blocked them. This incompetent witch wants to increase dragnet surveillance and increase "gun control". What about the other 37,000+ gun laws we've already got passed? What about the millions of guns that have already been purchased year over year that are still out there on the streets? Are those going to magically disappear? Guns are here, criminals don't worry their precious little heads over "common sense gun control", "universal background checks" or your "gun free zone" nonsense.
One of the biggest problems I think these alphabet agencies have, namely NSA at the very least, is warrant-less dragnet surveillance. Having data is great, but these folks are probably absolutely drowning in useless and trivial information, so much so that no algorithm can save them from the ever-growing cluster fuck they must manually sift through. How are you going to flag that data? 13 keywords? How many people use any one of those 13 keywords daily just talking about world events? I'm sure everybody is flagged at one point or another, possibly on a daily basis.
Imagine you're able to collect 90% of the world's E-Mail contents, 90% of the world's text messages and voice audio from phone calls. How much are you and your team going to be able to listen to on a daily basis? I'd figure such an agency would need to employ 10% of the U.S. population just to spy on the other 90% of the citizens, if everybody was assigned the same ten people daily, giving them an hour for each person each day. So if you have an estimated population of 320,000,000, you would need to employ 32,000,000 people to keep track of the other 288,000,000 people.
^That's only based on blindly assuming the NSA "we're spying on everything" myth is true. It wouldn't surprise me if it was, they're so bad at stopping terrorism. Either that or there is no NSA spy network, whatsoever.
Anyways...
It was only a few days ago that I mentioned how much these guys hate homosexuals. I had a feeling this sort of thing was going to happen any day now, I'm not even surprised they shot up a gay club. I already have a feeling I know where they'll hit next but... no, I shouldn't make predictions, it's bad luck and bad juju.