VX versus XP. Your view upon the two engines.
09-07-2009, 12:51 PM
To be honest, I don't really see a problem with either. Some people find XP far better to map with, but I find it nearly impossible to come up with a map in XP that looks half as decent as my maps in VX (or indeed 2k3). To be honest, I find the layers confusing. ^_^;;
That being said, I prefer the amount of resources available for XP.
For me, personally, the "limited" tileset thing doesn't really bother me. I've been able to make maps that people have loved using a mix of Mack and RTP tiles, and to me, if I can do that then its all that matters. :D
I, personally, prefer using VX simply because of m lack of ability to use XP, but I know a lot fo people can do really amazing things with XP... Therefore, I'm on the fence, saying that both are good. :P
That being said, I prefer the amount of resources available for XP.
For me, personally, the "limited" tileset thing doesn't really bother me. I've been able to make maps that people have loved using a mix of Mack and RTP tiles, and to me, if I can do that then its all that matters. :D
I, personally, prefer using VX simply because of m lack of ability to use XP, but I know a lot fo people can do really amazing things with XP... Therefore, I'm on the fence, saying that both are good. :P