RMRK is closing

[DerVVulfman]

Took a break. Took a plunge.

Now reconstructed are the "Event Systems" databases for RPGMaker XP and VX engines. Given that the forum was pretty much founded with RPGMaker VX was introduced, it should be known that there are more VX event systems and scripts than for any other engine. And I have yet to touch the VX scripts. But despite the quantity therein, few now use RPGMaker VX, so its not that high a priority compared to other works.

I have, however, begun work on the resources board. And I have completed the "Miscellaneous" subforum which contains some tools here and there, including links to a FREE and OFFICIAL copy of FL Studio. Version 7, but still FL studio.

:P I thought it was Saturday when doing it. :D Realized it was Friday, I'm a little ahead of schedule. ....

Whatever the heck schedule I even have that is....

[DerVVulfman]

Today, I worked on reconstruction of RMRK's Audio Resources subforum and the System Subforum for their Graphics Resources forum.

RMRK's Graphics forum is broken into four sections, Graphics, Characters, Battlers and System.  The system subforum had a number of windowskins and some Title and Gameover screens.  In fact, I was able to use the internet archive in tandem to recover the Gameover screens by our own rGangsta, his post in our forum used TinyPic links and rediscovery to restore his content was a blessing.

He thought so to... Having just told him at roughly 3pm (EST today). 

  niiice!  They shall live on!

So... well, I decided to begin tackling the Battler subforum.   Um, the very first topic...    ... had 99 individual graphics to upload and post.  ONE TOPIC... NINETY NINE GRAPHICS.

And it had 99 graphics because five of them were unrecoverable!!!  A monster! 

And Battler is the smaller of the other subforums...

               

[Ace_V]

Audio Resources? Very intriguing! I could always use more of those.

[DerVVulfman]

Today, I finished off the battler graphics subforum in the RMRK restoration task, and it was a headache. 

But now I am working upon the Mapping subforum. And with that, it was again the first thread to tackle that gave me...  .   While the topic had a lot of posts, it was worse in that they were "watermark-laiden" photoshop  resources.  And with that, I had to work through the Internet Archive in hopes to find older images prior to the application of the offending graphic.

I have restored roughly half of the mapping threads.  However, the other half ... are watermark/photoshop filled posts.

Uuuuuuugh--*

[DerVVulfman]

Today.... the Mapping Subforum of Graphic Resources have been finished being reconstructed in the RMRK archive. It was hell.

Ugh... Near every thread remaining had the watermarks. And even if you are able to visibly remove the Photobucket watermark on the screen, one needs to ensure the file saved isn't a .webp file when a .png is desired. This because its compressing the .png file and damaging it in the same manner as a .jpg. It takes a little extra to get the image un-touched and un-aliased. So much fun when you have triple-digit quantities of image files to save.

My next task will be the characters and facesets subforum.... which appears to have 50% more threads to recreate.

Oh, joy.

And it only just dawned on me.... ... I didn;t ust skip doing the RMVX scripts but neglected the RMXP scripts too... those need to be recreaed as WELL as the complete games section after this.

[Ace_V]

one needs to ensure the file saved isn't a .webp file when a .png is desired.  This because its compressing the .png file and damaging it in the same manner as a .jpg.  It takes a little extra to get the image un-touched and un-aliased.  So much fun when you have triple-digit quantities of image files to save.

  I continue to detest webp files. They won't play nice with my default picture viewer nor any of my graphics programs. And they tend to ruin alpha channels, as well. I use Irfanview to convert them into other file formats, though yeah the transparency settings become an issue. Using online converters could work, but not sure how fast that would be for hundreds of images.